Fermat and Mersenne Primes
Fermat primes
Numbers of the form $F_n=2^{2^n}+1$ were studied by the outstanding French Mathematician Pierre de Fermat and are called Fermat Numbers.The first five Fermat Numbers are F0=3,F1=5,F2=17,F3=257 and F4=65537
In order to find specific examples of primes, it seems reasonable to look at integers of the form 2m±1, since many small primes such as 3,5,7,17,31… have this form
If 2m+1 is prime then m=2n for some integers n≥0
Proof:we prove the contra positive that m is not a power of 2 then 2m+1 is not prime.If m is not a power of 2, then m has the form 2nq for some odd q>1.Now the polynomial f(t)=tq+1 has a root t=−1.So it is divisible by t+1.This is a proper factor since q>1, so putting t=x2n we see that the polynomial g(x)=f(x2n)=xm+1 has a proper factor x2n+1.taking x=2 we see that 22n+1 is a proper factor of the integer g(2)=2m+1, which cannot therefore be prime.
Numbers of the form Fn=22n+1 are called Fermat Numbers, and those which are prime are called Fermat Primes.Fermat conjectured that Fn is prime for every n≥0. For n=0,…,4, the numbers Fn=3,5,17,257,65537 are indeed prime.But in 1732 Euler showed that the next Fermat number
F5=225+1=4294967297=641×6700417
is composite.The Fermat numbers have been studied intensively, often with the aid of computers, but no further Fermat primes have been found. It is conceivable that there are further Fermat primes (perhaps infinitely many) which we have not yet found, but the evidence is not very convincing. These primes are important in geometry: in 1801 Gauss showed that a regular polygon with k sides can be constructed by ruler-and-compass methods if and only if k=2ep1…pr, where p1.....pr, are distinct Fermat primes.
Lemma: Distinct Fermat Numbers Fn are mutually coprime.
Proof:
Let d=gcd(Fn,Fm) be the greatest common divisors of two Fermat numbers Fn and Fm.(Fn=22n+1 and Fm=22m+1, where m and n are positive integers).Lets assume that d>1.
The difference between Fn and Fm is: Fn−Fm=(22n+1)−(22m+1)Mersenne Primes
Theorem:if m>1 and am−1 is prime, then a=2 and m is prime.
Proof:
1.Assume 2p−1 is prime, where p is a positive integer.3.Consider the factorization of 2p−1
5. It is also noted that
2p−1 cannot be prime if p is composite.
7.Thus, if 2p−1 is prime, then p must also be prime.
Integers of the form 2p−1,where p is prime, are called Mersenne numbers, after Mersenne who studied them in 1644; those which are Prime are called Mersenne Primes.
For the primes p=2,3,5,7, the Mersenne Numbers
Mp=3,7,31,127
are indeed Prime. But M11=2047=23∗89. So Mp is not prime for every prime p.
Visit https://www.mersenne.org/ to know more about the latest Mersenne Primes.As in the case of Fermat Primes, it is not known whether there are finitely or infinitely many Mersenne Primes.
Comments
Post a Comment